You can use it to process RAW files as well as manage them. The interface of Darktable itself is extremely similar to Lightroom. Darktable is an open source software, available for a wide range of platforms.
Lightroom Review Download On IOSUntil this year, Mac owners had three major options for organizing large digital photo collections: Apple’s mainstream iPhoto, Apple’s “pro” app Aperture, and Adobe’s similarly professional-grade Lightroom. I shall be reviewing 7 alternative Lightroom software that work on the Windows operating system and the Mac and review one good editing program that works on Linux.In addition to native support for M1-powered Apple computers and Qualcomm Snapdragon-powered Windows 10 Arm devices, Lightroom version 4.1 also adds support for Apple's ProRAW format, making it possible to import and edit images captured using Apple's new image format. For iPadOS and iOS devices, Lightroom also adds the option for adding a Widget to your mobile device's homescreen. Adobe has also addressed a few bug fixes and added support for new cameras and lenses.What is a Photo Editor Photo Editing Software Suggestions DxO PhotoLab Adobe Lightroom Adobe Photoshop Capture One from Phase One Affinity Photo Luminar.During its virtual keynote event, Apple noted native M1 versions of Adobe Photoshop and Adobe Lightroom Classic will be seen at the beginning of next year, but no specific timeframe has been given for those releases. Adobe has also announced that the free Lightroom Starter plan is available for Lightroom desktop (macOS and Windows) for users in Australia and NEw Zealand. This new free tier allows users to test Lightroom's core features without subscription or trial limits.The latest version of Adobe Lightroom should be available to download on iOS, iPadOS, macOS and Windows devices through the iOS App Store, Adobe Lightroom on the Mac App Store or through the Adobe Creative Cloud Desktop app on macOS and Windows computers.Update (Decem9:20am ET): Additional details added to the article now that Adobe has shared more details about the update.Alternately, Lightroom 6 can be purchased by itself for $149 as a standalone download, minus Photoshop and cloud functionality.Below, I’m going to focus on the key questions Aperture users have been asking: what it’s like to transition from Aperture to Lightroom — including new details added after initial publication of this article — plus which version of Lightroom to buy, and whether transitioning is a good (and safe) idea. As part of Adobe’s “Creative Cloud,” Lightroom CC comes bundled with Adobe’s latest version of Photoshop, plus cloud photo synchronization services, for $9.99 per month. On April 21, Adobe released Lightroom 6 and Lightroom CC (2015) as standalone and cloud-linked versions of the same app. Both promise major speed improvements over Lightroom 5, new tools and brushes, a new facial recognition feature, automatic HDR and panoramic photo creation, and new slideshow options. Apple understood that it was ceding at least the professional market to Lightroom, and even helped Adobe to develop Aperture and iPhoto to Lightroom importers. With the writing on the wall, some people switched to Lightroom 5 well before Photos officially debuted last month.I didn’t since Lightroom 5 was almost three years old, I wanted to see what Adobe would deliver in its much-anticipated sequel.Subscription plan costs more over time, but includes Photoshop CCQuestion 1: Should I Pick Lightroom 6 or Lightroom CC?There’s one threshold question you’ll have to answer before using Lightroom: Lightroom 6, or Lightroom CC? The correct answer will be different from person to person, so I’ll lay out the case for each version.Lightroom 6 is the right choice if you object to paying a monthly subscription fee — a valid concern if you are bringing a large photo library into Lightroom and plan to keep editing it years down the line. Powerful bulk-sharing and photo printing tools, decent book tool Numerous impressive editing tools work well and quickly Standalone version fully replaces Apple’s Aperture (or iPhoto) subscription version adds cloud photo sync and mobile apps Professional-class digital photo editing and library managementTechnically, the break-even point for subscribing to Lightroom CC relative to buying Lightroom 6 is 15 months of use, but that’s only if you value Photoshop CC (and whatever updates it may receive during that time) at $0. For $9.99 per month, Adobe’s Creative Cloud Photography package gives you access to both Lightroom CC and Photoshop CC, which are arguably the best photo organization and editing tools in the marketplace. Adobe has historically done a good job of keeping its apps working through annual OS X updates, though it has used under-the-hood improvements (such as 64-bit processor and Retina display support) to encourage upgrades.Lightroom CC is otherwise the right choice. To get to the iPhoto/Aperture tools, you need to leave that import screen, go to File > Plug-in Extras, then Import from Aperture Library. For some reason, the app’s initial import process takes you to a part of Lightroom that can only import individual images and folders, not iPhoto or Aperture libraries. Pick the one that’s best for your needs.Question 2: How Hard Is The Aperture To Lightroom Migration?I’d like to be able to tell you that the Aperture to Lightroom migration process is dead simple — which it certainly should have been — but in my experience, it wasn’t. Unlike Apple, which has made iCloud-based access completely unaffordable for users with large photo libraries, Adobe’s $9.99/month bundle of organizing and editing apps with cloud syncing between devices is actually reasonable for what’s being offered — assuming you’ll use both apps and the cloud services. When I queried its web-based help system — notably more than two weeks after Lightroom 6 was released — it brought me to this page, which Adobe hadn’t finished filling out:When I searched Adobe’s web site for solutions, I found that other Lightroom users have been howling about Aperture import issues on Adobe’s web site for months and trying to find workarounds. Sometimes, it displayed an error that it had “failed to obtain image version information from Aperture library,” but offered no workaround. Lightroom didn’t seem to know how to deal with this: it hung when trying to process my iMac’s small referenced library, and hung again when trying to process my MacBook Pro’s larger library. Xev for macA separate and time-consuming step, asking Lightroom to build 1:1 previews, turned out to be necessary to fix this issue, and (not surprisingly) killed the apparent space savings Lightroom initially offered. Arguably best of all, Lightroom’s catalog required less than 5GB of space on my MacBook’s SSD, versus the 182GB Aperture was using.As it turned out, however, Lightroom’s importer was — despite a setting claiming that the app would use ample, 2880-pixel-wide previews — actually using super low-resolution thumbnails that had been pre-embedded in my images, while the videos in my collection had no thumbnails at all. Despite creating thousands of folders to hold daily clusters of photos, Adobe’s tool performed a proper import of Aperture’s database structure, all neatly organized within Lightroom’s Collections section. Following Aperture’s work, it took more than two additional days for Lightroom to completely import my 194,400-photo library, running on a late-2013 2.6GHz Retina MacBook Pro.I liked that Lightroom automatically referenced my library, enabling all of the master files to sit on my external hard drive while the MacBook maintained a thumbnailed catalog of all of the images. After 16 hours, the library was combined, making it possible for Lightroom to transfer everything over… at a rate of 2-4% per hour. Then I started the process of completely de-referencing my Aperture library by moving the library file onto the hard drive where all of the images had been referenced, then combining them together using Aperture’s “consolidate library” feature. Its Library lets you look at filtered and sorted grids of your photographs, compare two or several photographs to one another, and using a tiny People icon, index photos by facial recognition like Apple’s Faces feature. Just like iPhoto and Aperture, Lightroom requires a bit of training to learn individual faces — and will occasionally find a “face” in a photo of a bowl of soup or something else without any trace of facial features, but the facial recognition interface is very easy to use.I personally prefer the look of Aperture’s main library grid, but Adobe’s black and gray surrounding interface is a better match for the spartan, flattened OS X Yosemite there’s thankfully no trace of Aperture’s awkward-looking “corkboard and Polaroid photo” UI in Lightroom’s People section, either. You can customize Lightroom’s grid such that photos are shown with ratings, filenames, badges, and other data, or use a less cluttered view with just pictures inside of optionally colored frames. Aperture placed its Library, Info, and Adjustments tabs on the top left Lightroom has similar tools at the top right. Similarly, the smaller footprint of the Lightroom library may be a boon for users with little space on their internal hard drives, though there are consequences to improving its preview images that aren’t either initially obvious or as easy as they should be to remedy. Adobe really needs to improve these key elements of the Lightroom migration experience.Question 3: Assuming You Migrate Successfully To Lightroom, What Is It Like?Using Lightroom CC/6 isn’t terribly different from using Aperture — it’s mostly a matter of learning where the same basic features are located.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorKim ArchivesCategories |